BastionCore · IR Readiness Tool

Incident Response Readiness Scorecard

Score your organization across 8 critical dimensions of incident response readiness. Uncoordinated response, regulatory penalties, and extended recovery times are the cost of an untested IR program. Know where you stand before it matters.

BastionCore IR Readiness Score

8 Dimensions · Max 40

IR Plan

2

Roles & Responsibilities

2

Incident Playbooks

2

Communication Protocols

2

Tabletop Exercises

2

Regulatory Readiness

3

BC/DR Integration

3

Detection & Forensics

4

Total Score

Developing Tier

20 / 40

BastionCore · IR Readiness Tool

Incident Response Readiness Scorecard

Score your organization across 8 critical dimensions of incident response readiness. Uncoordinated response, regulatory penalties, and extended recovery times are the cost of an untested IR program. Know where you stand before it matters.

BastionCore IR Readiness Score

8 Dimensions · Max 40

IR Plan

2

Roles & Responsibilities

2

Incident Playbooks

2

Communication Protocols

2

Tabletop Exercises

2

Regulatory Readiness

3

BC/DR Integration

3

Detection & Forensics

4

Total Score

Developing Tier

20 / 40

BastionCore · IR Readiness Tool

Incident Response Readiness Scorecard

Score your organization across 8 critical dimensions of incident response readiness. Uncoordinated response, regulatory penalties, and extended recovery times are the cost of an untested IR program. Know where you stand before it matters.

BastionCore IR Readiness Score

8 Dimensions · Max 40

IR Plan

2

Roles & Responsibilities

2

Incident Playbooks

2

Communication Protocols

2

Tabletop Exercises

2

Regulatory Readiness

3

BC/DR Integration

3

Detection & Forensics

4

Total Score

Developing Tier

20 / 40

Microsoft Gold Partner

HIPAA Compliant Deployments

SOX / FFIEC

Aligned

SOC 2

Practices

100+ Clients Managed

Microsoft Gold Partner

HIPAA Compliant Deployments

SOX / FFIEC Aligned

SOC 2 Practices

100+ Clients Managed

Microsoft Gold Partner

HIPAA Compliant Deployments

SOX / FFIEC Aligned

SOC 2 Practices

100+ Clients Managed

How to Use This Scorecard

This scorecard evaluates your organization across 8 critical dimensions of incident response readiness. For each dimension, you will rate your organization on a scale of 1 to 5 based on the criteria described. The total score provides a maturity rating and recommended next steps.

SOC Maturity Levels

1

Non-Existent

No capability or documentation exists in this area

2

Ad Hoc

Some informal capability exists but is inconsistent and undocumented

3

Developing

Documented processes exist but are not consistently followed or tested

4

Established

Processes are documented, followed, and periodically tested

5

Optimized

Processes are tested regularly, measured, and continuously improved

Instructions: For each dimension on the following pages, read the criteria carefully and circle or write the score (1-5) that best describes your organization today. Be honest with yourself. This assessment is most valuable when it reflects reality, not aspiration.

How to Use This Scorecard

This scorecard evaluates your organization across 8 critical dimensions of incident response readiness. For each dimension, you will rate your organization on a scale of 1 to 5 based on the criteria described. The total score provides a maturity rating and recommended next steps.

SOC Maturity Levels

1

Non-Existen

No capability or documentation exists in this area

2

Ad Hoc

Some informal capability exists but is inconsistent and undocumented

3

Developing

Documented processes exist but are not consistently followed or tested

4

Established

Processes are documented, followed, and periodically tested

5

Optimized

Processes are tested regularly, measured, and continuously improved

5

Optimized

Continuous improvement via metrics and automation.

Instructions: For each dimension on the following pages, read the criteria carefully and circle or write the score (1-5) that best describes your organization today. Be honest with yourself. This assessment is most valuable when it reflects reality, not aspiration.

How to Use This Scorecard

This scorecard evaluates your organization across 8 critical dimensions of incident response readiness. For each dimension, you will rate your organization on a scale of 1 to 5 based on the criteria described. The total score provides a maturity rating and recommended next steps.

SOC Maturity Levels

1

Non-Existent

No capability or documentation exists in this area

2

Ad Hoc

Some informal capability exists but is inconsistent and undocumented

3

Developing

Documented processes exist but are not consistently followed or tested

4

Established

Processes are documented, followed, and periodically tested

5

Optimized

Processes are tested regularly, measured, and continuously improved

Instructions: For each dimension on the following pages, read the criteria carefully and circle or write the score (1-5) that best describes your organization today. Be honest with yourself. This assessment is most valuable when it reflects reality, not aspiration.

Score your organization across all 8 dimensions

Score your organization across all 8 dimensions

Score your organization across all 8 dimensions

For each dimension, read the criteria carefully and write the score that best describes your organization today. Use the priority action boxes as your remediation guide for any dimension scoring 1 or 2.

For each dimension, read the criteria carefully and write the score that best describes your organization today. Use the priority action boxes as your remediation guide for any dimension scoring 1 or 2.

0 of 8 completed
0/ 40
01
Incident Response Plan
Not scored
02
Roles and Responsibilities
Not scored
03
Incident Playbooks
Not scored
04
Communication Protocols
Not scored
05
Tabletop Exercises and Testing
Not scored
06
Regulatory and Notification Readiness
Not scored
07
Business Continuity Integration
Not scored
08
Detection and Forensic Readiness
Not scored

RESULT

Add Your Scores From all 8 Dimensions

Your total score maps to one of four IR readiness maturity tiers. Each tier comes with a specific interpretation and recommended action path.

8–15

Critical

Significant gaps — immediate risk

Your organization has significant IR gaps that present immediate risk. A security incident would likely result in uncoordinated response, regulatory penalties, and extended recovery times. Recommend engaging professional IR planning support immediately.

16–24

Developing

Good on paper, never validated

Some foundations are in place, but gaps in testing, coordination, or integration create meaningful risk. Most organizations at this level have plans that look good on paper but have never been validated. Recommend tabletop exercises and gap remediation.

25-32

Established

Solid capability, room for optimization

Your organization has solid IR capability with room for optimization. Focus on increasing exercise frequency, broadening cross-functional participation, and tightening BC/DR integration to reach full maturity.

33-40

Optimized

Mature, well-tested IR program

Your IR program is mature and well-tested. Focus on continuous improvement, emerging threat scenarios (AI manipulation, cloud-native attacks), and maintaining exercise cadence to sustain this level.

RESULT

Add Your Scores From all 8 Dimensions

Your total score maps to one of four IR readiness maturity tiers. Each tier comes with a specific interpretation and recommended action path.

8–15

Critical

Significant gaps — immediate risk

Your organization has significant IR gaps that present immediate risk. A security incident would likely result in uncoordinated response, regulatory penalties, and extended recovery times. Recommend engaging professional IR planning support immediately.

16–24

Developing

Good on paper, never validated

Some foundations are in place, but gaps in testing, coordination, or integration create meaningful risk. Most organizations at this level have plans that look good on paper but have never been validated. Recommend tabletop exercises and gap remediation.

25-32

Established

Solid capability, room for optimization

Your organization has solid IR capability with room for optimization. Focus on increasing exercise frequency, broadening cross-functional participation, and tightening BC/DR integration to reach full maturity.

33-40

Optimized

Mature, well-tested IR program

Your IR program is mature and well-tested. Focus on continuous improvement, emerging threat scenarios (AI manipulation, cloud-native attacks), and maintaining exercise cadence to sustain this level.

RESULT

Add Your Scores From all 8 Dimensions

Your total score maps to one of four IR readiness maturity tiers. Each tier comes with a specific interpretation and recommended action path.

8–15

Critical

Significant gaps — immediate risk

Your organization has significant IR gaps that present immediate risk. A security incident would likely result in uncoordinated response, regulatory penalties, and extended recovery times. Recommend engaging professional IR planning support immediately.

16–24

Developing

Good on paper, never validated

Some foundations are in place, but gaps in testing, coordination, or integration create meaningful risk. Most organizations at this level have plans that look good on paper but have never been validated. Recommend tabletop exercises and gap remediation.

25-32

Established

Solid capability, room for optimization

Your organization has solid IR capability with room for optimization. Focus on increasing exercise frequency, broadening cross-functional participation, and tightening BC/DR integration to reach full maturity.

33-40

Optimized

Mature, well-tested IR program

Your IR program is mature and well-tested. Focus on continuous improvement, emerging threat scenarios (AI manipulation, cloud-native attacks), and maintaining exercise cadence to sustain this level.

Priority Actions by Domain

For dimensions scoring 3, schedule improvements within 90 days. These are the priority actions for the most common IR gaps.

IR Plan (Score 1-2)

Engage professional IR planning support to develop a NIST-aligned incident response plan within 60 days

Roles (Score 1-2)

Define an IR team with a RACI matrix covering IT, legal, HR, communications, and executive leadership

Playbooks (Score 1-2)

Develop ransomware and BEC playbooks as immediate priorities since these are the most common scenarios

Communication (Score 1-2)

Create pre-drafted notification templates and establish out-of-band communication channels

Exercises (Score 1-3)

Schedule at least one tabletop exercise within 90 days with cross-functional participation

Regulatory (Score 1-2)

Map all applicable breach notification requirements by jurisdiction and pre-engage legal counsel

BC/DR Integration (Score 1-2)

Conduct a business impact analysis and integrate findings into containment decision procedures

Detection (Score 1-2)

Implement centralized log management and establish baseline detection rules for critical assets

Priority Actions by Domain

For dimensions scoring 3, schedule improvements within 90 days. These are the priority actions for the most common IR gaps.

IR Plan (Score 1-2)

Engage professional IR planning support to develop a NIST-aligned incident response plan within 60 days

Roles (Score 1-2)

Define an IR team with a RACI matrix covering IT, legal, HR, communications, and executive leadership

Playbooks (Score 1-2)

Develop ransomware and BEC playbooks as immediate priorities since these are the most common scenarios

Communication (Score 1-2)

Create pre-drafted notification templates and establish out-of-band communication channels

Exercises (Score 1-3)

Schedule at least one tabletop exercise within 90 days with cross-functional participation

Regulatory (Score 1-2)

Map all applicable breach notification requirements by jurisdiction and pre-engage legal counsel

Detection (Score 1-2)

Implement centralized log management and establish baseline detection rules for critical assets

BC/DR Integration (Score 1-2)

Conduct a business impact analysis and integrate findings into containment decision procedures

Exercises (Score 1-3)

Schedule at least one tabletop exercise within 90 days with cross-functional participation

Priority Actions by Domain

For dimensions scoring 3, schedule improvements within 90 days. These are the priority actions for the most common IR gaps.

IR Plan (Score 1-2)

Engage professional IR planning support to develop a NIST-aligned incident response plan within 60 days

Roles (Score 1-2)

Define an IR team with a RACI matrix covering IT, legal, HR, communications, and executive leadership

Playbooks (Score 1-2)

Develop ransomware and BEC playbooks as immediate priorities since these are the most common scenarios

Communication (Score 1-2)

Create pre-drafted notification templates and establish out-of-band communication channels

Exercises (Score 1-3)

Schedule at least one tabletop exercise within 90 days with cross-functional participation

Regulatory (Score 1-2)

Map all applicable breach notification requirements by jurisdiction and pre-engage legal counsel

BC/DR Integration (Score 1-2)

Conduct a business impact analysis and integrate findings into containment decision procedures

Detection (Score 1-2)

Implement centralized log management and establish baseline detection rules for critical assets

Ready To Close The Gaps?

Your scorecard reveals where you stand. BastionCore builds the capability to close the gaps.

Ready To Close The Gaps?

Your scorecard reveals where you stand. BastionCore builds the capability to close the gaps.

Ready To Close The Gaps?

Your scorecard reveals where you stand. BastionCore builds the capability to close the gaps.